Tuesday, December 29, 2009

US Climate Bill Stalled In Senate

A post-Copenhagen post from Sarah Laskow at The Media Consortium's The Mulch:

The United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen should have cleared a path for the U.S. Congress move forward again on climate change legislation, but Senate Democrats already are saying the bill might not come in 2010. After fights over the stimulus and health care, legislators are less willing to stomach compromises on climate change. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is looking smarter for having passed the House’s version of the climate change bill when she had the chance.
Weekly Mulch: Climate Change Bill Stalls in Senate
It's going to take more than politics-as-normal to move legislators into action. Hard to arouse any New Year optimism about the future of global warming. Any suggestions gratefully appreciated.

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, December 28, 2009

Truth is Beauty: Bright Star

Another suggestion for holiday cinema. Even if you're not on vacation. Jane Campion's love story of Fanny Brawne and John Keats.

Bright Star: A Joy Forever

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, December 24, 2009

The Kimberley: Nowhere Else But Here

A video tribute ot the Kimberley/Pilbara region of Western Australia, introduced by Ernie Dingo. Features Broome band the Pigrim Brothers and their classic song 'Nowhere Else But Here'.

Great place, Category 5 cyclones and all.

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Google Gifts to Not-for-profits

Google is donating $US 20 million to a range of not-for-profit organisations. They include Global Voices, for which I am an occasional author. Another recipient is AIME (Australian Indigenous Mentoring Experience) which

is an Indigenous Corporation and a not-for-profit charity ... that uses a unique style of structured education mentoring to link university students in a one-on-one relationship with high school Indigenous students. AIME's objectives are to increase Year 10, Year 12 and university admission rates for all Indigenous Australian students who participate in the program.
It's an organisation I hadn't heard of before. Maybe this will help AIME to gain a higher profile.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Twitter Eruption over Australia's Internet Filter

A Global Voices post from Antoun Issa about Internet Filtering in Australia:

Australia's Communications Minister Stephen Conroy declared his determination last week to push through mandatory internet censorship of a government-defined blacklist of websites, sparking an online frenzy in blogs and on Twitter.

No Clean Feed - Stop Internet Censorship in AustraliaNews of the proposed internet censorship propelled the issue to a “trending topic” on Twitter for several hours, under the hashtag #nocleanfeed.

Australia pushes internet censorship; Twitter erupts
Disclosure: I am a GV author and this blog is quoted in Antoun's article.

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, December 21, 2009

Ross Garnaut:Copenhagen expectations overblown

If you missed the interview with Ross Garnaut on ABC News Breakfast today, please try this link:

Garnaut always seems so plausible. He's a glass-half-full kind of bloke.
No transcript available at this stage.

Sphere: Related Content

No Way Through to Bethlehem Maternity

Not that easy to get into and around Palestine these days. Thanks to Global Voices author Jillian York for alerting us to this video.

No Way Through won the Ctrl.Alt.Shift film Competition

How many more checkpoints to Bethlehem maternity? Try the inn.

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Citizen Journalism at COP15

Craille Maguire Gillies of MediaShift has an excellent piece about citizen journalism at COP15:

COP15 helped inspire unique alliances between NGOs, citizen journalist groups like the UpTake, and established publications such as the Nation, Grist and Mother Jones. Now these journalists are working with the groups they once reported on. These partnerships are as intertwined and intricate as a circuit board on the UN-issued Sony Ericsson phones so many of the press and delegates were loaned for the 10 days in Denmark. The UpTake, for instance, is part of the U.S.-based the Media Consortium, a coalition that includes Salon, Mother Jones and the Nation.
Activist-Journalists Bring Citizen, Pro Media Together at COP15
This is a key addition to the ongoing discussion about the evolution of the new media.

Sphere: Related Content

Oxfam's Reaction to COP15 No Deal: Historic Cop Out

Photos courtesy Oxfam international's photostream


18 December 2009


The ‘climate deal’ announced in Copenhagen today is a triumph of spin over substance said Oxfam International. The agreement – which was announced by the US, India, China and South Africa - has not been endorsed by the EU and many other countries.

The deal provides no confidence that catastrophic climate change will be averted or that poor countries will be given the money they need to adapt as temperatures rise. Leaders have also put off agreeing a legally binding deal until the end of 2010.

Oxfam said this is not a done deal - any agreement must be endorsed by all countries - and demanded that it be a floor not a ceiling on action.

Jeremy Hobbs, Executive Director of Oxfam International said:

“This agreement barely papers over the huge differences between countries which have plagued these talks for two years.

“The deal is a triumph of spin over substance. It recognizes the need to keep warming below 2 degrees but does not commit to do so. It kicks back the big decisions on emissions cuts and fudges the issue of climate cash.

“Millions of people around the world do not want to see their hopes for a fair, binding and ambitious deal die in Copenhagen. Leaders need to get back round the table in early 2010 and take the hard decisions they copped out of in Copenhagen.”


$100bn a year in climate cash for poor countries

This is an aspirational goal not a commitment – poor countries will have no confidence that they will receive the money they need to reduce their emissions and adapt to a changing climate.

$100bn is only half the money needed. The shortfall could mean that health workers in South Asia and Sub Saharan Africa will not get the $1.5bn they need each year to prevent climate induced deaths from malaria and diarrhoea.

There are no assurances that the $100bn will be additional to existing aid commitments. This means aid for education and health care could be diverted to pay for flood defenses.

The $100bn will not all be public money. Unless climate cash comes from public sources, there are no guarantees that it will reach the right people, in the right places, at the right time.

SPIN: Global temperature rises will be kept below 2 degrees centigrade


The absence of any emissions reductions targets means there is no guarantee that warming will be kept below 2 degrees centigrade. Climate science is clear on the need for rich countries to cut emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. Specific targets are essential.

Shorbanu Khatun, a climate migrant at the summit with Oxfam said: “I came all the way from a displaced persons camp on the flooded coast of Bangladesh to see justice done for the 45,000 people made homeless by cyclone Aila. How do I tell them their misery has fallen on deaf ears?”
More from Oxfam

Sphere: Related Content

Three Views on Copenhagen Deal

Is the glass half full or is it just empty rhetoric? Three initial reactions to the Copenhagen deal:

The world's nations have come together and concluded a historic--if incomplete--agreement to begin tackling global warming. Tonight's announcement is but a first step and much work remains to be done in the days and months ahead in order to seal a final international climate deal that is fair, binding, and ambitious. It is imperative that negotiations resume as soon as possible.

...A chilly two weeks in Copenhagen has given humanity its best chance of preventing the ravages of a warming world. Today's deal is neither perfect nor complete, but we must not this chance slip away.
Statement of Carl Pope, Sierra Club Executive Director
So much for the optimism:
We all know what we must do to solve global warming, but even the architects of this deal acknowledge that it does not take those necessary steps. Merely acknowledging the weaknesses of the deal, as President Obama has done, does not excuse its failings. If this is the best we can do, it is not nearly good enough. We stand at the precipice of climatic tipping points beyond which a climate crash will be out of our control. We cannot make truly meaningful and historic steps with the United States pledging to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by only 3 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. The science demands far more.

“The people of the United States voted for President Obama based on his promise of change and hope. But the only change today’s agreement brings is a greater risk of dangerous climate change. And the only hope that flows from Copenhagen stems not from the president’s hollow pronouncements but from the birth of a diverse global movement demanding real solutions and climate justice — demands made with a collective voice growing loud enough that in short order politicians will no longer be able to ignore it.
Center for Biological Diversity Statement on "Deal" at Copenhagen
And a call to mobilise:
Climate negotiations in Copenhagen have yielded a sham agreement with no real requirements for any countries. This is not a strong deal or a just one -- it isn't even a real one. It's just repackaging old positions and pretending they're new. The actions it suggests for the rich countries that caused the climate crisis are extraordinarily inadequate. This is a disastrous outcome for people around the world who face increasingly dire impacts from a destabilizing climate.

...Fortunately, while the cost of solving the climate crisis rises each day we fail to act, the crisis remains one that can largely be averted. It is up to the citizens of the world -- especially citizens of the United States, which has so impeded progress -- to mobilize and ensure that true solutions carry the day. I firmly believe that together, we can still achieve a politics in which climate justice prevails.
Friends of the Earth U.S. Reaction: Sham Deal Requires Nothing, Accomplishes Nothing
The United Nations finished the week basically where it started.

Shame, World, Shame!

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, December 18, 2009

Australia Wins Fossil of Day 10 at COP15

Australia has won yet another Fossil of the Day for Day 10 at Copenhagen COP15:

1st Place

 has been awarded a First Place Fossil of the Day Award for putting pressure on Pacific Island nations–and Tuvalu in particular–to agree to 2 degrees and 450 parts per million of CO2. You know, when we see one of the world’s most vulnerable nations take the kind of bold actions that we saw Tuvalu take last week, our hearts are warmed and we are filled with inspiration. And maybe that’s why we were so discouraged and angry to learn that Australia, one of Tuvalu’s bigger, richer neighbors has been acting like a big bully and asking Tuvalu to give up on its strong commitment to a legally binding agreement that keeps the world to 1.5 degrees of warming and 350 ppm. Have no fear, dear audience, Tuvalu stood firm in the face of this outrageous display of aggression…And it’s no small feat for a tiny country of 26sq kms and 6000 inhabitants to stand up to financial blackmail from big bad Australia. Our message to you, Australia? Time to act like a leader, not a bully.
Day 10: Australia Takes 1st Place for Bullying Tuvalu and Other Small Island States
My tip for Fossil of the Year is Canada.

Sphere: Related Content

Business Wants The Real Deal

From WWF:

Powering economies into the low carbon future:
Business leaders claim that a strong deal in Copenhagen will be good for the economy, a weak deal will be bad.

What will world leaders produce at the end of the week? A political deal? A legally binding deal? No deal at all?

There are rumours floating in and around the Bella Center that big business would prefer caution and the status quo instead of a treaty that is bold and sets comprehensive reduction targets.

That perception is incorrect. More than 1,000 businesses from all continents, most of them global players, are advocating for a strong legally binding deal that reduces carbon pollution and accelerates clean energy innovation on a global scale.
Business – The Real Deal
If you're a Facebook friend of Barack Obama or Kevin Rudd let them know we demand a real deal now.

Sphere: Related Content

Tony Abbott: Taking Australia Backwards

An unpaid political advertisement attacking Tony Abbott. From the Australian Labor Party:

Taking Australia Backwards from Australian Labor on Vimeo.

Climate Change & Work Choices are seen as his Achilles heels.

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Tony Abbott Not Colossal Fossil of the Year

CAN (Climate Action Network) and Avaaz.org present Fossil of the Day awards during COP conferences.

The Colossal Fossil of the Year will be presented on Friday 18 December at 1pm Copenhagen time.

Despite his recent contributions to the global warming debate, Australia's new Opposition leader Tony Abbott is not in the running this time around. Australia might run a place anyway.

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Friends of the Earth & Avaaz Excluded from COP15

Friends of the Earth & Avaaz have been excluded from COP15.

Nick Berning from FOE US posted this from inside the Bella Center earlier:

We've been sitting here for two hours now, about 50 Friends of the Earth representatives, all with accreditation and secondary badges, who have been refused admission to the conference. We are sitting in the registration area, between the registration/credentials desks and the photo desks.

UN climate chief Yvo de Boer came out and spoke to us awhile ago and said he wanted to resolve the situation. A few of our representatives have gone to talk to UN officials while we sit here, but our lack of access remains unresolved.

Initially there were a lot of reporters, but the UN has now cordoned us off and closed access to media.

The UN still has yet to give us a coherent reason for our having been denied access. We have been given different explanations by different officials: (1) we are a security threat or (2) there was no more room inside. It's hard to see how the "no room" explanation makes sense, as they continued to allow other NGO observers to enter even as we were denied access. And as for the security threat, we're a bunch of policy wonks and youth activists who have been participating in the negotiations every day for two weeks.

We've had both a member of the Norweigan and a member of the Canadian parliament come speak to us to lend us their support while we've been sitting here

One of the key roles Friends of the Earth has played at the conference has been to advocate for climate justice and the interests of the poor countries that have done the least to cause the climate crisis but will feel some of its strongest impacts. Negotiators from those countries are tremendously under-resourced here. For example, I've worked with negotiators who have no media officers (I do media work) to help them communicate their position. They are totally outgunned by the massive delegations of the rich countries, and now thanks to the UN's decision to exclude us, they will have even less support inside the Bella Center to fight for a fair agreement. It's really shameful.

Also --

Re the entry way more generally: appears that access to the conference has been almost completely shut down. We have a very clear view of the front doors and the security area, and people come through only very sporadically.'
Meanwhile direct action is taking place as part of Reclaim Power Now and Burn the Badge protests:
A crowd of youth, activists, indigenous peoples, and perhaps some delegates, burst in chants of “Climate Justice Now!” and “Reclaim Power!” in the middle of the Bella Center where the Copenhagen Climate Talks are being held. Instantly surrounded by cameras and media, the group began a march out of the center towards the gates of the building where as many as 10,000 people are planning to meet them in what organizers are calling the Reclaim Power action.

Reclaim Power Action Begins inside Copenhagen Climate Talks

Things are hotting up in Denmark as world leaders start to assemble in Copenhagen. Time for some leadership. The conflict is the easy part.

Sphere: Related Content

Australia's Brand Spanking Clean Feed Internet Filter

A brand spanking new Internet filter is on the way. Senator Stephen Conroy's Clean Feed is another step closer. This follows the release of the ISP Filtering Live Pilot Report. Government decisions were announced the same day. Why bother to release the report at all?

The Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy has announced:

1. Introduction of mandatory ISP-level filtering of Refused Classification (RC) –rated content.
2. A grants program to encourage the introduction of optional filtering by Internet Service Providers, to block additional content as requested by households.
3. An expansion of the cyber-safety outreach program run by the Australian Communications and Media Authority and the Cyber-Safety Online Helpline – to improve education and awareness of online safety.

Media Release 15 Dec 2009Measures to improve safety of the internet for families
There are many questions that need to be addressed:

The Blacklist

How many sites will be blocked? The report suggests that 10s or 100s of thousands are possible. 1000 were tested. In what ways is the current blacklist ineffective? the blacklist will be passed to ISPs in an encrypted form to avoid the list falling into the wrong hands. After the recent East Anglia climategate hacking, it won’t be long before that hope is dashed.

Passing on the Cost

ISP will be required to bear the costs. This could well be a disincentive to competition as small providers may be discouraged.

Non-sexual Content

As well as sexual sites Refused Classification RC (sic) list will include websites that contain "detailed instruction in crime, violence or drug use and/or material that advocates the doing of a terrorist act".

There goes boxing and several other Olympic sports. How will the list deal with different crimes in different States? If euthanasia is legalised in one State, would sites explaining how to use the laws be banned? Would sites arguing for a change in the law face censorship? Would links to “undesirable” constitute the grounds for black listing?

What about literature, which is full of detailed examples of crime, violence and drug use? Trainspotting? Fight Club? Crime and Punishment? Film and Television sites also pose a risk.


"The Government will also establish a grants program to encourage and assist ISPs to offer additional filtering services on a commercial basis for those families that wish to have a wider range of material filtered..."

However, "All six ISPs achieved 100 percent accuracy in blocking the ACMA blacklist. This was a requirement of the pilot. In blocking additional categories of content all six ISPs achieved 78 percent to 84 percent accuracy..." Only 22 percent got through. That’s encouraging.

The FAQ includes No.17. “Why does the Government consider demand exists for additional ISP-level filtering services?” The answer doesn’t mention demand just choice. The general public didn't use the free service and it has been discontinued. Why would they pay for an inaccurate service, especially one that may include over-blocking? But that's a sideshow, as filters for parents are already available on the market. You can already spy on your kids from work if you so desire. Big Father knows best!

Scope of Censorship/Protection

The RC system is not a filtering mechanism that will protect children from accidental or deliberate access to pornography, just the "illegal" stuff. Nor will it catch out child pornographers and paedophiles. Apparently, "Telstra found its filtering solution was not effective in the case of non-web based protocols such as instant messaging, peer-to-peer or chat rooms." ACMA will only list a very limited number of specific internet addresses (URLs).


According to the report, "A technically competent user could, if they wished, circumvent the filtering technology." Technical competence is widespread, including amongst the young. So why spend money on something that is easily circumvented.

Political Equations: In the Wink of an Eye

Kevin Rudd’s Labor government is unlikely to win many votes from this initiative. It’s uncertain if it will lose many in a climate change dominated election. What it faces is a major loss of goodwill from those who object to the filter's authoritarian potential. Imagine Tony Abbott or Kevin Andrews in charge of deciding what's appropriate. Don't mentioned RU486?

The good news is that the internet speeds should not be affected very much. It will be done in the wink of an eye, or as Telstra reported, a delay “equivalent to one seventieth of the blink of an eye”.

Kevin on Facebook: “The Rudd Government's approach to cyber-safety has been informed by the trial of internet filtering and extensive industry feedback about the most appropriate way to improve safety for families online.” What about community consultation? It’s the sort of action you would announce the week of COP15 in Copenhagen and ten days before Christmas. Most of those affected won’t read past the headline.

If the government’s aim is to protect children from inappropriate content, then this scheme won’t achieve that. If it wants to stop illegal material on the web, then it should be confined to criminal material of a sexual nature as proposed in the ALP’s policy in 2007. If it’s trying to increase its popularity amongst “families”, then it’s wasting time and money.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

The Boycott: Lysistrata Comes to Copenhagen

Following in the footsteps of Lysistrata, global warming has its own sex strike:

The Boycott tells the story of the First Lady of the United States launching a nationwide sex strike to fight global warming and save the world. Come for a raucous tour of Oval Office affairs, psychedelic absinthe trips, enchanted frogs, movie star cameos, and land in a heap of unabashed hope.
The Boycott Kathryn Blume
This is a sample - Part 4

Sphere: Related Content

Climate Change: Show Us the Money

A Global Warming finance post from Dernogalizer

Developed countries need to show they’re serious about climate change, and phasing out fossil fuel subsidies while providing financing to developing countries is a win-win that could propel the negotiations in the right direction.
How about some serious financing

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, December 14, 2009

Climate Plea: Don't Give Tazzy a Brazilian

From the Melbourne Walk Against Warming: Don't Give Tazzy a Brazilian Thanks to Amanda for the photos.

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Walk Against Warming Sydney Style

Thanks to Joni for this video from the Sydney Walk Against Warming. His original post is at Blogocrats and on YouTube.

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Yale Scientists on Climate Science

From Yale University re Climategate and science:

Our broad understanding of Earth’s climate system is based on observations, experiments and models by atmospheric chemists, meteorologists, glaciologists, solar and planetary physicists, oceanographers, geologists, geochemists, biologists, paleontologists, paleoclimatologists, paleoecologists and climate dynamicists. Finding agreement among these diverse groups is often as fractious as peace negotiations between warring nations. And yet, when it comes to the major issues of climate change, agreement exists.
‘Climate-Gate’ and COP15: Yale Scientists Clarify Current Understanding of Climate Change

To read about some of that agreement, please click the link.

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, December 11, 2009

Copenhagen CAN International Video: Tuvalu Roars

From Climate Action Network International, a video about Day 4 COP15 Climate Change conference. It includes coverage of Tuvalu, the mouse that's roaring:

Sphere: Related Content

Climategate Conspiracies on Both Sides

Although I got over conspiracy theories long ago, there are plenty on both sides of the global warming science debate. A couple of blog posts attempting to turn the East Anglia controversy back on its proponents:

There has been quite an assault on the climate science in the past few weeks. Far more so than ever before, which is saying something given the Climate Cover-Up that’s gone on for so long. First, e-mails were hacked from a British university, showing some cherry-picked conversations between climate scientists, which global warming deniers have stretched and chalked up to data misrepresentation, and a massive global scientific conspiracy to trick people into reducing greenhouse gas emissions. For more background information on the entire issue, check out EnviroKnow.
The Scientists Strike Back The Dernogalizer

From Richard Graves at Huffington Post:
The real scandal is not the email archive, or even how it was acquired, sorted, and uploaded to a Russian server, but rather the emerging evidence of a coordinated international campaign to target and harass climate scientists, break and enter into government climate labs, and misrepresent climate science through a sophisticated media infrastructure on the eve of the international climate talks.
Climate-Gate Is Watergate Redux

King hit, sideshow or simply a distraction? Make up your own mind. There are endless sceptics' posts in the blogosphere and MSM.

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, December 10, 2009

COP15 Copenhagen Update 10 Dec

Some USA stuff from COP15 Copenhagen :

"If you are looking for a few hints about where to find top notch journalists, the following list of journalists comes via by The Society of Environmental Journalists": Welcoming the Environmental Journalist to the Endangered Species List

The US State Department Press Room for Copenhagen.

Hopenhagen? No, thanks: Naomi Klein on COP15

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

ABC's Climate Timeline

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation's Journey through Climate History is fun and a way to introduce an investigation of the science.

Sphere: Related Content

2000–2009 Our Warmest Decade?

The Global Warming debate continues. So does the data:

The year 2009 is likely to rank in the top 10 warmest on record since the beginning of instrumental climate records in 1850, according to data sources compiled by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). The global combined sea surface and land surface air temperature for 2009 (January–October) is currently estimated at 0.44°C ± 0.11°C (0.79°F ± 0.20°F) above the 1961–1990 annual average of 14.00°C/57.2°F. The current nominal ranking of 2009, which does not account for uncertainties in the annual averages, places it as the fifth-warmest year. The decade of the 2000s (2000–2009) was warmer than the decade spanning the 1990s (1990–1999), which in turn was warmer than the 1980s (1980–1989). More complete data for the remainder of the year 2009 will be analysed at the beginning of 2010 to update the current assessment.
2000–2009, THE WARMEST DECADE World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 8 Dec 2009
Time for real action on Climate Change.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Climate Science Q&A for Copenhagen

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) has a Climate Science Q&A for Copenhagen website. It's for journalists covering COP15. They can email seeking assistance with questions of climate science.

Don't die wondering!

Sphere: Related Content

Global Warming Artic Melt Video

From EngageMedia who are posting daily video updates from COP15 Copenhagen:

Sphere: Related Content

Building the Climate Change Ark

The Avaarz.org Action Factory DC has begun building its ARK.

If you build it, they will come. When we set out to build a huge ark on the national mall to illustrate what we’ll need if we don’t get a climate deal, we expected to make a splash. What we weren’t prepared for was the response from concerned folks from all different corners of DC who want something to do to help. The Ark Takes Shape

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, December 7, 2009

Australia's 2010 Climate Change Election

A cross post from Global Voices: Australia Faces 2010 Climate Change Election:

The fortnight before Copenhagen has seen a topsy-turvy political bun-fight in Australian climate politics. The Rudd Labor government’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) Bill was amended after negotiations with the conservative Liberal National Coalition, only to be defeated by them in the Senate. The Liberal Party dumped their leader Malcolm Turnbull and rejected their own deal. New Opposition leader Tony Abbott has hung his leadership on a climate sceptic strategy.


Sphere: Related Content

Tony Abbott's Climate Plan B: The Ark

Thanks to The Avaaz.org Action Factory for Climate Plan B: The Ark

Tony Abbott, climate change sceptic and new leader of the parliamentary Opposition in Australia, is looking for a new policy. We can go two by two into his brave new world.

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Spinning the Higgins and Bradfield By-election Numbers

Lots of talk about an Abbott triumph. How does it measure up against the stats? Some data comparing Saturday with the 2007 election results:

2009 Turnout 74.24%, Fletcher 36,628 votes
2007 Turnout 94.03% Nelson 49,817 votes

Fletcher's vote was down 4.47 %.

2009 Turnout 71.70%, O'Dwyer 32,779 votes
2007 93.77% 2007, Costello 43,761 votes

O'Dwyer's vote was up 0.34%

The 2009 By-election figures do not include postal votes.

It appears that 10,000 less people voted for each Liberal candidate this time.

Replacing Malcolm Turnbull and walking away from the climate change consensus may have shored up the true blue Liberal heartland, just. Could be the Palin effect at work.

An interesting comparison is the 2008 by-elections:

Gippsland turnout 89.68%,
Mayo 80.12% and
Lyne 87.41%.

This is the stuff of which myths are made. Anyway, a win is a win is a ...

Now it's on to Copenhagen.

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Obama Shifts Date for Copenhagen Climate Conference Visit

Barack Obama has shifted his visit to COP15 in Copenhagen to the second week in anticipation of some kind of result.

This is the official United Nations statement:


The President strongly believes that all nations have a responsibility to combat the threat of climate change. He has already taken unprecedented action to do so at home, including an historic investment in clean energy solutions that will reduce our dependence on oil and create jobs. Abroad, he has engaged leaders bilaterally and multilaterally on the issue of climate change, and agreed to participate in the climate conference in Copenhagen.

After months of diplomatic activity, there is progress being made towards a meaningful Copenhagen accord in which all countries pledge to take action against the global threat of climate change. Following bilateral meetings with the President and since the United States announced an emissions reduction target that reflects the progress being made in Congress towards comprehensive energy legislation, China and India have for the first time set targets to reduce their carbon intensity. There has also been progress in advancing the Danish proposal for an immediate, operational accord that covers all of the issues under negotiation, including the endorsement of key elements of this approach by the 53 countries represented at the Commonwealth Summit last weekend.

This week, the President discussed the status of the negotiations with Prime Minister Rudd, Chancellor Merkel, President Sarkozy, and Prime Minister Brown and concluded that there appears to be an emerging consensus that a core element of the Copenhagen accord should be to mobilize $10 billion a year by 2012 to support adaptation and mitigation in developing countries, particularly the most vulnerable and least developed countries that could be destabilized by the impacts of climate change. The United States will pay its fair share of that amount and other countries will make substantial commitments as well. In Copenhagen, we also need to address the need for financing in the longerterm to support adaptation and mitigation in developing countries.

Providing this assistance is not only a humanitarian imperative - it's an investment in our common security, as no climate change accord can succeed if it does not help all countries reduce their emissions.

Based on his conversations with other leaders and the progress that has already been made to give momentum to negotiations, the President believes that continued US leadership can be most productive through his participation at the end of the Copenhagen conference on December 18th rather than on December 9th. There are still outstanding issues that must be negotiated for an agreement to be reached, but this decision reflects the President's commitment to doing all that he can to pursue a outcome. The United States will have representation in Copenhagen throughout the negotiating process by State Department negotiators and Cabinet officials who will highlight the great strides we have made this year towards a clean energy economy.
One small step...

Sphere: Related Content

International Volunteers Day 5 December 2009

5 December is International Volunteer Day 2009.

For the intrepid at heart, check out Indigenous Community Volunteers:

Indigenous Community Volunteers is a not-for-profit, non-government organisation that links Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities with skilled volunteers. ICV works in partnership with communities to provide access to the skills and knowledge that communities request. ICV also recruits volunteers to complete community development projects with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community groups.

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, December 4, 2009

Glossary of Climate Change Acronyms spells it out

The Glossary of Climate Change Acronyms (GOCCA) has lots of explanations about climate change terms as well as acronyms.

Tony Abbott, the new leader of the conservative opposition in Australia, may not read much about global warming himself. This is chance for him to get up to speed.

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

The Story of Cap & Trade Divides Greens

Two points of view on solutions to Global Warming. Firstly from the Story of Stuff Project

Secondly, a critical response to the video by climate change campaigner David Roberts:

The greenosphere is all abuzz about a new video from Annie Leonard, creator of semi-famous anti-consumerism video/book The Story of Stuff. It’s being billed as a definitive debunking of cap-and-trade, but it’s more like a perfect representation of all the confusion and misplaced focus that plagues the green left right now.

Annie Leonard misses the mark in her new video, “The Story of Cap-and-Trade”

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Abbott v Turnbull: Ignorance Trumps Arrogance

The title should say it all but my words of wisdom will have to wait to tomorrow:

Ignorance Trumps Arrogance! Shame, Liberals shame!

Sphere: Related Content
Back to Top